われわれは狂ったのか？ーーロシア特別軍事作戦に至るまでの背景

 

実に簡潔明瞭な説明。こういった人物がいる限り、米国は、世界は、まだ修正可能と思いたいね。

◼️リチャード・ブラック大佐が語るロシアの特別軍事作戦に至るまでの背景

リチャード・ブラック大佐（退役）元米国陸軍国防総省刑事法部門長、元ヴァージニア州上院議員。

元のフル動画↓

◼️Why are we risking nuclear war over Ukraine? Have we gone mad?

Col. Richard Black (ret.), former head of the U.S. Army’s Criminal Law Division at the Pentagon and former Virginia State Senator, addresses the May 26 Schiller Institute conference.

…………………

以下、「ウクライナ戦争に関する米国政府の16の大嘘」だが、要約邦訳なので注意。

Alzhacker @Alzhacker 2022年5月27日 ウクライナ戦争に関する米国政府の16の大嘘 https://globalresearch.ca/16-biggest-lies-us-government-tells-america-about-ukraine-war/5780694…

1. 「ウクライナは民主主義国家である」 ウクライナのヴォロディミル・ゼレンスキー大統領は、すべての野党を禁止し、第二国語としてロシア語を使用することを禁止した。

2. 「国家主権は神聖である」 イディ・アミンがウガンダで大量虐殺を行ったとき、国連はそれを阻止するためにウガンダの主権を侵害した。米国は最近の戦争で多くの主権を侵害し、何百万人もの人々を殺してきた。ウクライナが少数民族を大量虐殺したことを考えると主権は尊重されるべきなのか

3. 「プーチンは戦争犯罪者」 民間人を死亡させたことをもって戦争犯罪人とするならば 2014年以降ドンバスで1万4千人の民間人を殺害したウクライナをどう呼ぶのか？ 他の最近の戦争でアメリカが殺した数百万人の方が何百倍もひどい。

4. 「世界はロシアの侵攻を非難している」 実際には、中国、インド、アフリカの大部分、イスラエル、ラテンアメリカの半分、その他多くの国々を含め、世界のほとんどがそうではない。ロシアの二大政党は、ロシアの介入に反対しておらず、第二党は共産党である。

5. 「プーチンは核兵器を使用すると脅している」 ロシアは米国と同じ方針である。ロシアには、米国が拒否するまで「先制不使用」政策があったが、ロシアはそれを取りやめた。アメリカの大統領は、第二次世界大戦後、アメリカにとって脅威でない国に対して何度も核兵器を使用すると脅している。

6. 「壁に背を向けているプーチンは、シリアのように化学兵器に頼るだろう」 ロシアはシリアで化学兵器を使用しなかった。米国はイラクに化学兵器を与え、それはイラクによって備蓄が破壊される前の1982年から83年にかけて、何千人ものクルド人とイラン人を殺すために使用された。

7. 「プーチンは生物兵器に頼るかもしれない」 この告発は3月の第2週にメディアによって宣伝されたが、ペンタゴンがウクライナの研究所に資金を提供しているという恥ずかしい事実が明らかになって以来、メディアではこれ以上何も語られなくなった。

8. 「ロシアはウクライナの民間人を標的にしている」 バイデンがプーチンを戦争犯罪と非難したブチャの民間人虐殺の疑惑は、ロシア軍が数日前に去った後、協力者と思われる人々を町に「浄化」していたウクライナ人によって行われたものであった。

9. 「ロシアは偽旗攻撃を行う」 ある産科病棟では、そこからウクライナのスナイパーが狙撃していたことが報告されている。脱出したマリウポリの住民は、ウクライナの戦闘員が人間の盾として使うために人道的回廊を通じて民間人が脱出するのを妨げていたと証言している。

10. 「プーチンがウクライナで優勢になれば、次はNATO諸国を攻撃するだろう」 ロシアはすでに過剰に拡張されており他の国を攻撃できず、明らかに馬鹿げている。ロシアの目標は、ドンバスを守りクリミアを認めさせ、ウクライナを脱ナチス化し、核ミサイルがロシアの国境に近づかないようにすることだ。

11. 「ロシアは原子力発電所を脅かしている」 ロシア兵は、不注意または故意の損傷を防ぐために、これらのプラントを 「警備・管理 」するよう命じられた。写真では、ウクライナ人が最初に発砲し、ロシアの戦車を破壊し、そこに2台目の戦車が応戦した。この交戦で訓練用の建物も損傷した。

12. 「ロシアの侵攻は全世界を脅かす」 もしロシアが、米国の核ミサイルをモスクワまで飛行機で7分のウクライナに配置させないことに成功すれば、ロシアは人類に大きな恩恵を与えることになる。ウクライナのミサイルは、検証のための警告時間がほとんどなく、事故や誤算の可能性を高めることになる。

13. 「米国には「報道の自由」があるが、ロシアのニュースは統制されている」 米国のメディアは、過去の米国の戦争（ベトナム、イラク、シリア、ガザ、イエメン、アフガニスタン）で示されたように、ペンタゴンよりも危険で戦争好きであることが証明されている。

14. 「ロシアは米国へのサイバー攻撃を計画している」 「このような多国間のサイバー計画に関するモスクワのビジョンには、情報通信技術を武器として使用しない一連の義務が含まれている 」とクレムリンのAndrey KrutskikhはNewsweekに述べている。

15. 「ロシアは子供を殺している」 子供の死はすべて偶発的なものであり、米国やイスラエルによる意図的な子供の殺害とは違う。マドレーン・オルブライトは、米国の制裁によってイラクで餓死した50万人の子供たちは価値があったのかと尋ねられたとき、彼女は「はい」と答えた。

16. 「ロシアは戦術核兵器を使用する可能性がある」 ロシアは通常爆薬でキエフを平らげることができたのに、そうしなかった、では、なぜ核兵器を使うのだろう？

より詳しくは以下の英原文にて補われたし。

◼️The 16 Biggest Lies the U.S. Government Tells America About the Ukraine War By Richard Ochs Global Research, May 25, 2022
1. “Ukraine is a democracy” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky banned all opposition parties and banned the use of Russian as a second state language. Why did he violate his 2019 campaign promise to stop the genocidal killing of thousands in Donbas, even though they voted for him? Did he lie because neo-Nazis threatened to kill him if he did not do what they wanted? [1] Or is he afraid of the CIA, which has assassinated other leaders, making him their puppet? Are we to trust the judgment of a man who demands a no-fly zone which could cause a global nuclear holocaust? Zelensky oversees torture and assassination of political dissenters. [2]
2. “National sovereignty is sacred” When Idi Amin perpetrated genocide in Uganda, the UN violated Ugandan sovereignty to stop it. When Ukraine perpetrated genocide in Donbas and planned to escalate, Russia stopped it. [3] The U.S. violated Cuba's sovereignty to take the planet to the edge of nuclear holocaust. The U.S. has violated lots of sovereignties in recent wars, killing millions. Given Ukraine's genocide of a national minority, “should Ukraine's sovereignty be respected”.
3. “Putin is a war criminal” If he is a war criminal for causing the deaths of civilians, what do we call Ukraine killing 14,000 civilians in Donbas since 2014? [4] Is anyone calling Zelensky a war criminal? Millions killed by the U.S. in other recent wars is hundreds of times worse. Calling Putin a war criminal stops Biden from negotiating with him with the excuse “one cannot talk to war criminals.” That makes it very difficult to stop this war. Evidently, the U.S. wants this war to continue to the last Ukrainian. The plan of the Rand Corporation is to “quagmire” Russia just like the U.S. bankrupted the USSR by starting the al-Qaeda opposition in Afghanistan.
4. “The world condemns Russia's invasion” Actually most of the world does not, including China, India, most of Africa, Israel, half of Latin America and many other countries. The two largest political parties in Russia do not oppose Russia's intervention, the second largest party being the Communist Party.
5. “Putin has threatened to use nuclear weapons” Russia has the same policy as the U.S. On March 22, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia would only use nuclear weapons if its very existence were threatened, Tassnews agency reported. [5] Russia had a “no first use” policy until the U.S. refused to do the same, so Russia dropped it. U.S. presidents have threatened to use nuclear weapons several times since the end of WWII against countries not a threat to the U.S. [6]
6. “With his back against the wall, Putin will resort to chemical warfare, just like in Syria” Russia did not use chemical weapons in Syria. Russia negotiated Syrian stockpiles to be destroyed or removed. The chemical attacks in Syria were done by rebels supported by Saudi Arabia and the U.S. [7] If anyone has their back against the wall, it is the Ukrainians and neo-Nazis who are trained in false-flag tactics by the CIA. Like in Syria, the U.S. media are falsely blaming the Russians with no evidence whatsoever. Like in Syria, any chemicals released in Ukraine will probably be the work of opponents of Russia to blame Russia. The U.S. gave Iraq chemical weapons which were used to kill thousands of Kurds and Iranians in 1982-83 before stockpiles were destroyed by Iraq. The U.S. is the chemical killer, not Russia which prevented it. History is full of U.S. false flags. [8]
7. “Putin may resort to biological warfare” While this charge was propagated by media during the second week of March, since the embarrassing revelation that the Pentagon funded labs in Ukraine, nothing more has been said about it in the media. It was first reported by the U.S. that hazardous specimens had to be destroyed lest they fall into the hands of Russians; later, it was reported that specimens were not dangerous at all, so as not to incriminate the U.S. Which was it? Any false-flag release of pathogens by Ukraine to blame Russia is now probably precluded. The Pentagon is guilty of funding gain-of-function virus research in China after it was banned in the U.S., posing a possible lab release of COVID-19. The U.S. is the bio-killer using a U.S. Army strain of anthrax in October 2001, not Russia.
8. “Russia is targeting civilians in Ukraine” According to Newsweek, “Putin is not intentionally attacking civilians…Over the course of almost four weeks, missiles fired at Kyiv have been scarce…The destruction is only a small fraction of what is possible.” [9] The alleged massacre of civilians in Bucha, prompting Biden to accuse Putin of war crimes, was perpetrated by Ukrainians who were “cleansing” the town of presumed collaborators after Russian troops had left days before. [10]
9. “Russia will make false-flag attacks” There is no evidence that Russia attacked targets and blamed Ukraine. On the contrary, seven days prior to Russia's incursion, the OSCE Monitoring Mission gave evidence of a Ukrainian false-flag attack on a kindergarten to blame Donbas separatists. [11] None were killed, but Ukrainian shelling of Donetsk increased 100-fold over the next four days, leading to Russia's incursion to stop it. [12] The attacks on a maternity ward, apartments and concert hall may have been false-flag attacks, staged events, or situations where civilians were held hostage by combatants. It was reported that one maternity ward had Ukrainian snipers shooting from there. Residents of Mariupol who got out testified that Ukrainian combatants were preventing civilians from escaping through the humanitarian corridor in order to use them as human shields. [13]
10. “If Putin prevails in Ukraine, he will attack NATO countries next” That is patently ridiculous because Russia is already over-extended and not able to attack anyone else. Russia also does not want a nuclear war. Russia's goal is to protect Donbas, get recognition of Crimea, de-Nazify Ukraine and prevent nuclear missiles close to Russia's border. By exaggerating Putin's goals instead of negotiating these goals, the U.S. is prolonging the war and provoking the destruction of Ukraine.
11. “Russia is threatening nuclear power plants” Russian soldiers were ordered to “guard and control” these plants to prevent inadvertent or deliberate damage. Photos showed Ukrainians fired the first shot, destroying a Russian tank, whereupon a second tank returned fire. A training building was damaged in the exchange. The fires were not near the reactors. The electricity for cooling was never turned off.  But the hype was spun to scare the crap out of Europe so as to get their intervention into the Ukraine war. [14]
12. “Russia's invasion threatens the whole world” If Russia succeeds in keeping U.S. nuclear missiles from being positioned in Ukraine seven minutes' flight to Moscow, Russia will be doing humanity a big favor. Just as U.S. ICBM fixed missiles are on hair-trigger alert with “launch them or lose them” orders with no cancellations after launch possible, missiles in Ukraine would increase the chance of accident or miscalculation with little warning time to verify. Doomsday would be on pins and needles. That should scare the crap out of everyone. India had an accidental missile launchin March that landed in nuclear-armed Pakistan with no warhead. [15] Putin warned in 2019 that any incoming missile would be presumed to be nuclear, requiring a retaliatory launch by Russia before the incoming missile hit so Russia's deterrent force would not be destroyed. [16] The U.S. and NATO are threatening the planet, not Russia. Here are the facts:
	1. President Reagan rejected President Gorbachev's offer to give up deployment of a “Star Wars” missile defense system in space as a condition for both countries to eliminate all their nuclear weapons.  2. President Clinton refused President Putin's offer to cut our massive nuclear. arsenals to 1,500 bombs each, and to call on all of the other nuclear-armed states to negotiate the elimination of all nuclear weapons, in exchange for the U.S. not placing missile sites in Romania.  3. President George W. Bush walked out of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and put a missile base in Romania.
	4. President Trump placed another missile base in Poland. President Bush in 2008 and President Obama in 2014 blocked any discussion of Russian and Chinese proposals for a space weapons ban in the consensus-bound UN Committee for Disarmament in Geneva.  5. President Obama rejected President Putin's offer to negotiate a treaty to ban cyber war.  6. President Trump pulled the U.S. out of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.  7. From President Clinton through President Biden, the U.S. has never ratified the 1992 Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, while Russia ratified it.
Should there be any question that it is the U.S., not Russia, that is not only threatening the world, but is threatening the entire human race for all eternity?
13. “The U.S. has a ‘free press' while Russia's news is controlled” U.S. news outlets are owned by Wall Street billionaire oligarchs who give so-called journalists the script to report, making TV reporters paid actors who know where their bread is buttered. The U.S. media have proven to be more dangerous and warlike than the Pentagon, as shown in past U.S. wars (Vietnam, Iraq, Syria, Gaza, Yemen, Afghanistan). Now these billionaires are censoring social media, so we are censored in doing personal research. The U.S. has shut down Russian media like Tass and Russia Today (RT) to prevent Americans from hearing the other side and making up our own minds who is lying and who is telling the truth. What is the U.S. afraid of if they are telling the truth? According to Carl Bernstein, Pulitzer Prize journalist, the CIA has captured The New York Times and The Washington Post.
14. “Russia is planning cyber attacks on the U.S.” Russia remains open for dialogue and cooperation on information security with all states, and the United States is not an exception,” the Kremlin's Andrey Krutskikh told Newsweek. “Moscow's vision of such a multilateral cyber scheme includes a set of obligations not to use ICTs as a weapon.” A potentially key meeting was in April when Krutskikh sought to work with Washington in the digital realm. [17]
15. “Russia is killing children.” The numbers are being exaggerated like all the other exaggerations by Ukraine to get NATO into the war. Any child deaths are accidental, not like the deliberate murder of children by the U.S. and Israel. When Madeleine Albright was asked if the half million children starved to death in Iraq from U.S. sanctions were worth it, she answered “yes.” [18] During Israel's 2014 “Operation Protective Edge,” Israeli military forces killed 2,200 Palestinians, more than 80% of whom were civilians, and nearly one-quarter of whom were children. [19]
16. “Russia may use tactical nuclear weapons.” Russia could have flattened Kyiv with conventional explosives, but did not, so why would they use nuclear weapons?